Board engagement with AI is no longer a distant strategic consideration. As generative AI accelerates the pace of change across industries, future-ready boards are already beginning to adjust how they govern, recognizing that traditional oversight models are too slow and reactive for an AI-driven world. Their challenge is no longer whether to engage or not, but how to proactively help their organizations move faster without losing control, consistency, and trust.
However, most boards are not designed for this environment. Many people are hearing the same advice: add more AI experts, approve a roadmap, get educated on AI, and start an AI steering committee. But these moves often miss the point. Boards that are lagging behind have more than a little information. They still govern AI as a technology issue rather than a leadership issue.
So what does effective board leadership on AI actually look like?
Here are five moves future-ready boards are making to accelerate AI.
1. They focus on leadership, not technology. Boards do not need deep AI expertise, but they do need access to the right perspectives, both in management and on the board. This means having the right combination of “AI architects” who build systems and “AI shapers” who incorporate AI into the actual operations of the business. Boards will increasingly need to assess leaders against the “SHAPE'' leadership competencies identified by ghSMART (strategic agility, human-centeredness, applied curiosity, performance drive, and ethical stewardship) that can help predict whether leaders are equipped to lead AI-driven change (and where gaps may limit impact).
2. These form the conditions for AI leadership to flourish. If an organization is optimized for stability rather than learning and agility, AI will stall.
3. Evolve your governance cadence to match the pace of AI. Annual planning cycles are poorly suited to rapidly changing environments. Future-ready boards are adopting faster, more dynamic oversight cadences that allow executives to pivot, scale, or halt AI initiatives before value and trust are compromised.
4. Integrate AI into CEO succession planning. AI is reshaping what it means to be a CEO. Boards that rely on traditional succession criteria, often embedded in traditional CEO scorecards, run the risk of selecting leaders optimized for yesterday's environment. In CEO succession planning efforts, AI is becoming a more explicit element in how boards assess CEO readiness and potential. They use SHAPE as a foundation to clarify leadership competencies that are currently non-negotiable, identify gaps among potential successors, and intentionally develop those competencies over time.
5. Anchor your AI efforts in long-term purpose and value. AI efforts divorced from strategy and culture create noise rather than lasting value. Boards are uniquely positioned to ensure that AI strengthens the company’s long-term vision, intentionally shapes culture, and maintains stakeholder trust.
Boards that are constantly on their toes aren't trying to be technologists. They are doubling down on what only boards can and should do: set direction, shape leadership, and secure the right CEO to lead the AI-enabled world now and in the future. Every board should ask, “Are our CEOs and succession pipeline truly ready for the future, or is leadership the biggest constraint when it comes to AI?”
